By Monroe Roark
Times Correspondent
Possible privatization of
services and the future of several hundred jobs was the main topic
of discussion at Monday night’s regular monthly meeting of the Henry
County Board of Education.
 |
|
The possible privatization of
custodial and lawn services for Henry County Schools was the
main topic discussed at Monday’s Board meeting.
Photo by Monroe Roark |
Sporting red shirts in a show
of solidarity, most of the audience members were in attendance on
behalf of the school system’s custodial and lawn service employees
since word has spread that the board is soliciting bids to outsource
those services.
According to school system
officials, a total of 315 employees are included in the custodial
and groundskeeping departments. Out of this year’s budget, $9.2
million is allocated for their salaries and benefits.
A number of people at the
meeting wore buttons with such phrases as, “We support our public
school employees,” and, “Don’t privatize! Our schools aren’t for
sale.”
The meeting started 30
minutes late due to a prior executive session during which the board
heard student disciplinary appeals. Once the public session began,
many in attendance were more than ready to make their concerns known
to the board during the public participation portion of the meeting.
The first speaker, a
representative of the Georgia Association of Educators, stated that
the majority of employees live in the districts of the schools where
they work. They know the students and their families. They have many
years on the job and plan to stay.
“These are professionals,” he
said. “They love the jobs they are in.”
One custodial employee
expressed concern that he and many others learned of this issue in
the community rather than hearing it straight from the leadership of
the school system. He said this was disrespectful.
“We can do better than this,”
he said. “These people are our neighbors. We worship together, and
we play together.”
As with most of the speakers
on this topic, he returned to his seat amid a standing ovation. Many
of the comments throughout the night elicited a response that could
be compared to a revival service in a local church.
Several themes were repeated
throughout the evening. The board was warned about the economic
effects of mass layoffs that would come from privatization, such as
health care costs that would be passed down to the taxpayers and a
lack of tax revenue due to a rising number of foreclosed homes owned
by people who could no longer pay their bills after losing their
jobs.
School security was mentioned
often during the discussion. Many were concerned that contracted
workers would not be as sensitive to the needs of the students as
long-time employees, and having relative strangers roaming the halls
of the school buildings each day was not a good idea. One speaker
even raised the possibility of lawsuits stemming from inappropriate
actions a new worker might commit with a student.
The overall comments did come
solely from affected employees. Concerned parents spoke up as well.
“These are people,” one man
said. “There are some things more important than a dollar.”
None of the board members
commented on the issue at the end of the public participation
period. There has been no board discussion since the annual retreat,
when the decision was made to solicit bids, according to school
system spokesman J.D. Hardin.
The bid period ends March 22,
and the board will likely address the bids at the next work session,
which is scheduled for March 27 due to spring break.
Possible privatization of
various services has been discussed several times over the years as
the school system faces ongoing budget difficulties – as much at
$200 million lost over the past 10 years due to state funding
reductions and falling tax revenue in a down economy. The fact that
bids are being solicited this year, however, does not guarantee that
privatization will occur, Hardin stressed.
“This decision
[soliciting bids] was not made lightly,” he said, adding that the
board’s many responsibilities include being the best possible
stewards of the taxpayers’ money. Any bids under consideration would
be scrutinized very strictly to ensure that safety and security of
students and employees, among other considerations, would be met.